Reading refereed reports and how to respond in a scientific communication

• Alixon David Reyes Rodríguez

  , Universidad Adventista de Chile, Chillán-Chile

  Author

  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9857-0930 (unauthenticated)

The review systems of scientific journals decide on papers that represent scientific contributions. In this context, it happens that, after receiving and reading the referees’ comments, and when processing this information emotionally, some new authors either do not find the right way to respond, or when doing so, they divert their focus, generating a sterile discussion with the reviewer, minimizing the chances of acceptance of a text that could have been published. Therefore, this article presents suggestions for a reading focused on the technical-scientific scope of the text, and how to respond to the referees by qualifying the article in question.

1. Alixon David Reyes Rodríguez, , Universidad Adventista de Chile, Chillán-Chile

   Doctor en Educación. Actualmente, Director de Posgrado, profesor del Magíster en Ciencias de la Motricidad Humana de la Universidad Adventista de Chile; profesor de la Maestría en Educación
   Física Integral del Instituto Superior de Formación Docente Salomé Ureña. Miembro de la Sociedad Chilena de Educación Científica. Investigador del Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO);del Grupo de Estudios AFSYE, Chile; del Centro de Investigación en Pedagogía del Movimiento “Prof. Darwin Reyes”, Venezuela; del Grupo de Investigación en Educación Física y Salud, Instituto Superior de Formación Docente Salomé Ureña, República Dominicana. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9857-0930

• PDF (Spanish)

• 2023-03-31 (2)
• 2024-04-03 (1)

Copyright (c) 2023 FIDES ET RATIO

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.